Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2024-03-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2024-03-11 House Journal Page 1767 HB 265 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 265 "An Act changing the term 'child pornography' to 'child sexual abuse material.'" with the: Journal Page STA RPT 7DP 1456 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 1456 FN2: ZERO(ADM) 1456 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 1456 FN4: ZERO(DPS) 1456 JUD RPT 6DP 1AM 1640 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 1640 FN2: ZERO(ADM) 1640 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 1640 FN4: ZERO(DPS) 1640 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Gray: Page 2, line 11: Delete "(a)(1)" Insert "(a) [(a)(1)]" Page 3, line 15: Delete "(a)(1)" Insert "(a) [(a)(1)]" 2024-03-11 House Journal Page 1768 Representative Gray moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Allard objected. Representative Gray moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. Representative Allard objected and withdrew the objection. Representative Sumner objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be withdrawn?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 265 Second Reading Amendment No. 1/Withdraw YEAS: 25 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Baker, Carrick, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, Josephson, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Story, Stutes, Vance Nays: Allard, Armstrong, Carpenter, Coulombe, Cronk, Fields, D.Johnson, McCabe, Rauscher, Shaw, Stapp, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Wright And so, Amendment No. 1 was withdrawn. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, line 1, through page 12, line 28 (title amendment): Following "sexual abuse material" in all places: Insert "or child pornography" Representative Josephson objected. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 2024-03-11 House Journal Page 1769 Representative McCabe rose to a point of order regarding confining remarks to the amendment. The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 265 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 34 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Eastman, D.Johnson, Ortiz, Stapp, Sumner, Tomaszewski Nays: Allard, Armstrong, Baker, Carpenter, Carrick, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Shaw, Story, Stutes, Tilton, Vance, Wright And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 265 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. HB 265 will advance to third reading on the next day's calendar.